"Original and stimulating...makes a solid and important contribution to early modern scholarship."--Steven Nadler, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Schmaltz defends Malebranche's claim that his rejection of Descartes' doctrine that mind is better known than body had a Cartesian basis.
"Original and stimulating...makes a solid and important contribution to early modern scholarship."--Steven Nadler, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Schmaltz defends Malebranche's claim that his rejection of Descartes' doctrine that mind is better known than body had a Cartesian basis.
This book tries to show that Berkeley, when he was preparing to write his early books, made a thorough study of the Recherche , that the Berkeleian philosophy still bears the specific impress of...
First published in 1876, this classic work of philosophy by William Curtis Swabey provides a detailed analysis of the ideas and theories of the French philosopher Nicolas Malebranche. Drawing on the...