It has often been suggested that Luke's two volumes were written as an apology for Christianity, to demonstrate to the Roman authorities that the new faith was not a dangerous and subversive innovation, a threat to the Pax Romana and to Roman rule. This book reviews the development of the 'traditional perspective', then raises some questions, e.g. if Luke was writing an apologia pro ecclesia, why does he include so much material politically damaging to the Christian cause? Is it possible that the approach has been made from the wrong angle, that Luke was writing an apologia not pro ecclesia but pro imperio, to assure his fellow Christians that Church and Empire need not fear or suspect each other? This conclusion is then supported by an investigation of the text of Luke-Acts, particularly the trials of Jesus and Paul. This challenging volume will be of interest to students and scholars of the New Testament and to ecclesiastical and Roman historians.
Boy and girl meet (again). But they don't fall in love.University radio DJ Ellice Sanchez has always been good with words. But she can't seem to find the words to explain to her friends how and why...
Mic is a high enlisted rank in an elite unit of the National Guard 150 years in the future. He has a Marine Corps background. He patrols a rural area when he stumbles across some unusual sightings...