Thomas Curry argues that discussion and interpretation of the First Amendment have reached a point of deep crisis. Historical scholarship dealing with the background and interpretation of the Amendment are at an impasse, says Curry, and judicial interpretation is in a state of disarray. His purpose is to provide a new paradigm for the understanding and exploration of religious liberty. He traces much of the current difficulty to the largely unexamined assumption on
the part of judges and scholars that the Amendment created a right - the right to free exercise of religion - and that the courts are the guardians of that right. In fact, however, the First Amendment
is above all a limitation on government and a guarantee that the government will not impinge on the religious liberty that citizens already possess by natural right.
Judges and scholars assume, Curry suggests, that the First Amendment created a right to free exercise of religion. Rather, it imposed a limitation on government's ability to impinge on the religious liberty that citizens already possess by natural right.
Judges and scholars assume, Curry suggests, that the First Amendment created a right to free exercise of religion. Rather, it imposed a limitation on government's ability to impinge on the religious liberty that citizens already possess by natural right.
A major new reinterpretation of the religious superstate that defined both Europe and Christianity, by one of our foremost medieval historiansIn the fourth century AD, a new faith exploded out of...
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks,...
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures,...