This book features opening arguments followed by two rounds of reply between two moral philosophers on opposing sides of the abortion debate. In the opening essays, Kate Greasley and Christopher Kaczor lay out what they take to be the best case for and against abortion rights. In the ensuing dialogue, they engage with each other's arguments and each responds to criticisms fielded by the other. Their conversational argument explores such fundamental questions as: what gives a person the right to life? Is abortion bad for women? What is the difference between abortion and infanticide? Underpinned by philosophical reasoning and methodology, this book provides opposing and clearly structured perspectives on a highly emotive and controversial issue. The result gives readers a window into how moral philosophers argue about the contentious issue of abortion rights, and an in-depth analysis of the compelling arguments on both sides.
The Snowflake Chronicles is a series of short books that aims to challenge, move and stir us to think about issues that provoke the political status quo.INTRODUCTION BY ROGER FRANKLINFOREWORD BY...
Women Right to Choose book is a collection with one purpose in mind and that is her right to choose. Her uterus, her voice. The collective goal overall purpose is to unite all non believer together...
The present work is a qualitative study with the general objective of identifying and analyzing how the actors involved with the theme influence the entry of the theme to the governmental agenda and...
This book looks at the trajectories of reproduction and abortion rights in diverse socio-cultural contexts in various countries, and the regional concerns which animate these discourses.Abortion as...